Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Cleanup sweeps

atomode ships two pure-geometric cKDTree-based sweeps that act directly on pair distances, with no springs and no integrator:

Together they form the cleanup stage of the refinement pipelines (Voronoi tile → orientation refine → cleanup → FIRE or MACE). Raw Voronoi tilings contain overlapping pairs at grain boundaries that produce divergent forces in either relaxer — stiff calibrated angle springs in FIRE, near-singular repulsion in MACE-MP0 — and the sweeps remove those overlaps at negligible cost before the relaxer starts.

Both live in src/atomode/_pair_relax.py, assume orthorhombic periodic cells, and are vectorised at the pair level via numpy.

bond_relax: attract-to-peak + repel-from-hard-core

Per sweep, find every pair within max_cut = 1.05 · max(pair_outer[bonded], pair_hard_min) via cKDTree.query_pairs. For each pair (i,j)(i, j) with species (si,sj)(s_i, s_j) and signed gap δ=rijrpeak\delta = r_{ij} - r_\text{peak}:

Δrpair=α(rijrpeak)attract (bonded & within router)    ρmax(rhardrij,0)repel (any pair below hard core)\Delta r_\text{pair} = \underbrace{\alpha \cdot (r_{ij} - r_\text{peak})}_{\text{attract (bonded \& within $r_\text{outer}$)}} \;-\; \underbrace{\rho \cdot \max(r_\text{hard} - r_{ij}, 0)}_{\text{repel (any pair below hard core)}}

with default α=0.2\alpha = 0.2 (attract fraction) and ρ=1.0\rho = 1.0 (repel fraction). The signed displacement is split between ii and jj along the bond axis, accumulated across all pairs with np.add.at, then clipped per-atom to max_step = 0.2 Å to keep dense regions stable when an atom receives many overlapping contributions.

Bonded-pair filter. Only species pairs with coordination_target[s_i, s_j] > 0 are attracted; the hard-core repulsion applies to every pair regardless of bonding. This is what prevents, e.g., the second-shell Si–Si peak in SiO₂ from being pulled to bond distance.

Convergence. 20 sweeps typically bring every bonded pair within 0.01 Å of its peak. The default n_iter = 40 is a saturation point — further iterations no longer move atoms.

Why α<ρ\alpha < \rho. Attract is slower than repel because overshooting a bond peak (and then needing to pull back) is more expensive than overshooting a hard-core wall (atoms can’t sit inside the wall). At α=0.2\alpha = 0.2 a pair starting 0.5 Å above its peak needs ~10 sweeps to close the gap; at α=1\alpha = 1 it oscillates.

Limits. The sweeps act on pair distances only; they cannot relax angle strain. Stopping after cleanup leaves a substantial energy residual relative to a full FIRE quench — measured numbers are in FIRE relaxation → Cost and convergence.

enforce_hard_core: pure projection

bond_relax (and FIRE) can leave a soft tail of pairs slightly below the hard-core wall — natural for the spring potentials, but not acceptable for some downstream consumers (DFT input, hard-sphere analysis). enforce_hard_core is a strict projection: every pair with rij<rhard[si,sj]r_{ij} < r_\text{hard}[s_i, s_j] gets pushed apart along their bond vector by

Δrpair=12(rhardrij)r^ij\Delta r_\text{pair} = -\tfrac{1}{2} \, (r_\text{hard} - r_{ij}) \, \hat{\mathbf r}_{ij}

(default push_fraction = 0.5, so each atom moves by half the deficit — they meet in the middle). The cKDTree query uses max_cutoff = 1.05 · max(pair_hard_min) to bound the candidate set.

Convergence. Geometric: each iteration reduces the worst violation by a factor of 1 - push_fraction, so log2(initial deficit/tolerance)\log_2(\text{initial deficit} / \text{tolerance}) iterations suffice. Default n_iter = 40 covers any realistic input. Dense clusters where many overlapping pairs interact may need a few more.

Cost of strict projection. A small delta in g(r) at rhardr_\text{hard} — atoms pile up at exactly the wall instead of distributing naturally above it. For visual / structural analysis the natural soft tail is preferable; as a standalone post-processing step the projection is opt-in.

Pseudocode

# bond_relax core loop (per sweep)
wrap = positions - np.floor(positions / box) * box        # PBC-wrap
tree = cKDTree(wrap, boxsize=box)
pairs = tree.query_pairs(max_cut, output_type="ndarray")  # (M, 2)
delta = wrap[pairs[:, 1]] - wrap[pairs[:, 0]]
delta -= np.round(delta / box) * box                      # min-image
dist  = np.linalg.norm(delta, axis=1)
unit  = delta / dist[:, None]

attract = where(is_bond & (dist <= outer),
                (dist - peak) * 0.2, 0.0)
repel   = where(dist < hard_core,
                -(hard_core - dist) * 1.0, 0.0)
disp = unit * (attract + repel)[:, None]

# Accumulate split displacement, clip per atom, apply.
atom_disp = np.zeros_like(positions)
np.add.at(atom_disp, pairs[:, 0], disp)
np.add.at(atom_disp, pairs[:, 1], -disp)
mag = np.linalg.norm(atom_disp, axis=1)
atom_disp *= np.clip(0.2 / mag, 0.0, 1.0)[:, None]
positions += atom_disp

enforce_hard_core is the same shape with attract = 0 and a strict (not fractional) deficit push.

Where to read the code

See also